Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Comparing databases

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Date: 2003-11-13 04:07:31
Message-ID: 200311130407.hAD47VK16942@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:01:00AM -0500, Ned Lilly wrote:
> > > All I'm saying is that from the outside, IMHO, it just creates more
> > > problems than it solves.  To use a favorite metaphor from this
> > > list, PHB's will read that and smell instability.  I repeat, why
> > > volunteer it?  Just say there are many firms providing support
> > > today, and it's used at X, Y, and Z companies.
> > 
> > I second this.
> 
> Me too.  How about something along the lines of "Postgresql is supported 
> by several different companies, ensuring that no one company can drive the 
> project in any one direction against the best interests of the community"?

How about:

  Me too.  How about something along the lines of "Postgresql is supported 
  by several different companies, preventing vendor lock-in.
                                  ..........................

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2003-11-13 04:32:33
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2003-11-13 00:29:59
Subject: Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group