On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
> > As Tom announced on Friday, Release Candidate 1 has now been tag'd and
> > bundled ...
> Can you please sometime decide once and for all how you're going to name
> the tarballs and then communicate that information to the group? Is it
> rc1 or RC1, beta2 or b2? It's not that there is a technical problem with
> any of these choices, but the amount of randomness in this process just
> scares me with every new release you make.
Why does it scare you? *raised eyebrow*
As for beta, I used 'beta#' throughout this release cycle, and will use
RC# for the release candidate(s) ...
> > please test to confirm that nothing seems off with this build
> The tarball contains a file doc/man-7.4.tar.gz, but the makefiles expect
> to see a file doc/man.tar.gz.
k, am re-generating with the change in place ...
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Manfred Spraul||Date: 2003-11-03 20:49:44|
|Subject: Re: Avoiding SIGPIPE (was Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2003-11-03 20:36:57|
|Subject: Re: RC1 on AIX - working thus far|