Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 15:31, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > Well, "partial solution" isn't quite what I would call it, and it surely 
> > needs integration with sequential scans. I really do expect the whole 
> > hack to fall apart if some concurrent seqscans are going on
> 
> I'd rather see us implement a buffer replacement policy that considers
> both frequency + recency (unlike LRU, which considers only recency).
> Ideally, that would work "automagically". I'm hoping to get a chance to
> implement ARC[1] during the 7.5 cycle.

Someone just started working on it this week.  He emailed Jan and I.  He
hopes to have a patch in a few days.  I will make sure he posts to
hackers/patches.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

• Re: Vacuum thoughts at 2003-10-31 23:48:28 from Neil Conway

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2003-11-01 05:19:22
	Subject: Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL 7.3.4 and 7.4beta5
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2003-11-01 04:51:57
	Subject: Re: Problems with whitespace-ignoring diff options