Re: static pg_dump

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: static pg_dump
Date: 2003-10-31 20:40:18
Message-ID: 200310312040.h9VKeIW22915@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > > Is there any way we could build a static version of the 7.4 pg_dump, to
> > > make it easy to dump existing databases using the 7.4 dump? Otherwise,
> > > it's quite difficult to arrange to have two different postgres
> > > installations, etc...
> >
> > Why? There should be no problem installing both 7.3 and 7.4 libpq.so
> > --- if they don't have different version numbers, something's wrong.
>
> libpq? I thought only the minor version number changed. On linux that means
> you can only usefully have one installed at once, the older one would never be
> used. I think on other OSes the older one might be used sometimes.
>
> In any case, can't 7.3 pg_dump use the 7.4 libpq?
> If not then the major version should be bumped.

7.4 pg_dump should be able to use 7.3's libpq --- the API has not
changed, so we didn't bump the major number.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-31 20:54:16 Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-31 19:51:12 Re: Annotated release notes