| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Press Release |
| Date: | 2003-10-29 23:07:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200310292307.h9TN7uv10199@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:24, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > If anybody has evidence that the FSM index management doens't work, then we'll
> > cut the paragraph. However, I'm inclined to trust Tom & Co., and my only
> > simple tests seemed to uphold the Lazy-Vacuum-ability of indexes.
>
> Tom has laid out at least one case where the potential for index growth
> exits, though I don't see it in a quick search of the archives...
>
> Tom, can you weigh in here?
If you delete all but one row on every index page, I think.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-29 23:21:58 | Re: Press Release |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-10-29 23:07:28 | Re: Press Release |