| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Press Release |
| Date: | 2003-10-30 00:58:05 |
| Message-ID: | 200310291658.05979.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh,
> I knew that it would delay the need for a vacuum full but I didn't know
> it could
> potentially eliminate it. O.k.
Sure. I've got one project where the client hasn't had a VACUUM FULL in 1.5
years. REINDEX, on the other hand ....
Of course, this doesn't work for all databases. DBs that involve huge data
transformations would require preposterously high FSM settings.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-10-30 01:02:02 | Re: Press Release |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-10-30 00:57:14 | Re: Press Release |