Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Open items

From: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open items
Date: 2003-10-28 13:54:54
Message-ID: 20031028135454.C11167@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:32:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Have gcc use -g, add --disable-debug, rename?
> 
> Personally I don't like the idea of this behavior defaulting differently
> depending on which compiler you use.  I can see the practical arguments
> for doing so, but it still rubs me the wrong way.  Can anyone offer new
> arguments pro or con here?

Not an argument.. I use gcc, and I configure --enable-debug --enable-cassert.
I was surprised reading the discussion that the "--enable-debug" was
superfluous and thought it didn't "feel right"..

Cheers,

Patrick

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 2003-10-28 13:56:56
Subject: Re: Open items
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2003-10-28 13:21:37
Subject: Re: Open items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group