| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <jm(at)poure(dot)com>, Bruno LEVEQUE <bruno(dot)leveque(at)net6d(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Vincent Harcq <vha(at)audaxis(dot)com>, Jean-Paul ARGUDO <jpargudo(at)free(dot)fr> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2003-10-21 21:00:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200310211400.20420.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Scott,
> > It is hard to understand that if he is willing to make PostgreSQL the
> > default for Compiere, why he would refuse to include any changes to
> > allow Oracle and PostgreSQL to both work.
>
> But if what he wants is nested transactions, then I could see him paying
> for development providing better ROI than forking the code. Is that what
> was meant by "the right kind of transaction support" ?
If he wanted nested transactions, and was willing to pay for development, I
can't imagine us turning him down. Nested xtn have been on the TODO list for
years.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-10-21 21:26:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-10-21 20:46:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-10-21 21:26:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Anthony W. Youngman | 2003-10-21 20:58:01 | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |