Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Cisco & Postgres

From: Tim Conrad <tim(at)timconrad(dot)org>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cisco & Postgres
Date: 2003-10-17 14:20:21
Message-ID: 20031017142021.GA12672@external.timconrad.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
I'm not sure which version it is.  It doesn't really say anywhere,
and the device itself is a limited 'ios' shell. Of course, I could
boot off of another linux cdrom and mount the filesystems, but i
have concerns about loosing support if I do that. It probably
wouldn't happen, but I'm paranoid, especially when I may have
support needs for putting it into production. :)

For what it's worth, the Apache version is 1.3.27, which is fairly
current, so I wouldn't be suprised if it's in the 7.3 strain.

Here's some of the postmaster log, though. I don't know if it'd help
anyone figure out which  version it is:

2003-09-29 16:25:16 [1331]   DEBUG:  database system was interrupted
at 2003-09-29 16:02:07 UTC
2003-09-29 16:25:16 [1331]   DEBUG:  checkpoint record is at
0/10F7F4
2003-09-29 16:25:16 [1331]   DEBUG:  redo record is at 0/10F7F4;
undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE
2003-09-29 16:25:16 [1331]   DEBUG:  next transaction id: 91; next
oid: 16557
2003-09-29 16:25:16 [1331]   DEBUG:  database system was not
properly shut down; automatic recovery in progress
2003-09-29 16:25:16 [1331]   DEBUG:  redo starts at 0/10F834
2003-09-29 16:25:17 [1331]   DEBUG:  ReadRecord: record with zero
length at 0/185D8C
2003-09-29 16:25:17 [1331]   DEBUG:  redo done at 0/185D68
2003-09-29 16:25:19 [1331]   DEBUG:  database system is ready

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:44:53AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> Yep, we noticed this a few years back. I think someone was googling for
> postgresql and ran across a bunch of mentions in their on-line
> documentation.  Out of curiosity, what version were they running?
> 
> Robert Treat
> 
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 20:28, Tim Conrad wrote:
> > Not exactly sure if this is worthwhile pointing out, or if someone
> > already has, but I got a couple of Cisco 7305 Content Engines the
> > other day. Today, I was working on configuring them, and noticed
> > that they're running Linux as an os with Postgres on it. Not quite
> > sure what it's used for, other than probably for configuration info.                                                                        
> > 
> > It's just nice to be able to say, hey, xyz uses Postgres, so should
> > you. :)
> > 
> > Tim


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Matthew T. O'ConnorDate: 2003-10-17 14:32:10
Subject: Re: Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-17 14:05:16
Subject: Re: Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group