Re: Patch for allowing multiple -t <table-name> options for

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for allowing multiple -t <table-name> options for
Date: 2003-10-09 19:25:13
Message-ID: 200310091925.h99JPD528198@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


This has been saved for the 7.5 release:

http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This si my first look at the pg-code, so it may not comply with the
> coding-standards. I haven't coded in C for a while either, so if someone
> finds a better way to implement this, go ahead, but this patch works for me
> with 7.4beta3.
>
> http://home.officenet.no/~andreak/pg_dump.c.diff
>
> comments are welcome.
>
> If it's ok, I'll remove my debuging statements and provide a cleaner patch.
>
> - --
> Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
> Managing Director, Senior Software Developer
> OfficeNet AS
>
> - - Writing software is more fun than working.
>
> gpg public_key: http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/et34UopImDh2gfQRAqtBAKCcrJ3mlN5G6Jp3h3kz2G8zMlc2xgCeLmOv
> 844vwdmhcU4/VLjugW+ISF8=
> =/hYF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 19:30:18 Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-10-09 19:08:39 Re: Triggers on SELECT?