Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,"scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3
Date: 2003-10-02 19:15:33
Message-ID: 20031002191533.GA18417@wolff.to (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:47:06 -0700,
  "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>  Possible scenario for maintaining 7.3:
> 
>  Only one or two committers  using a two stage cvs... one stage for 
> testing (not including sandbox), one stage for commit.
>  Scheduled releases based on non-critical fixes. Quarterly? Of course 
> critical fixes should be released as soon as plausible.
> 
>  Separate mailing list for 7.3 issues, concerns etc... Which would help 
> develop it's own temporary community.
> 
> Thoughts?

It might be better to split into two different trees. One just gets bug fixes,
the other gets bug fixes plus enhancements that won't require an initdb.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dror MatalonDate: 2003-10-02 19:15:47
Subject: count(*) slow on large tables
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-02 19:10:46
Subject: Re: Large block size problems and notes...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group