From:
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To:
"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,"scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3
Date:
2003-10-02 19:15:33
Message-ID:
20031002191533.GA18417@wolff.to (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2003-09-30 16:37:26 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-01 12:36:43 from "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2003-10-01 13:14:07 from Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
2003-10-01 13:41:18 from "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2003-10-01 15:50:14 from Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
2003-10-01 17:58:51 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-01 18:55:51 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2003-10-01 14:49:22 from Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
2003-10-01 15:40:23 from Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
2003-10-01 15:48:56 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-01 16:39:54 from Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
2003-10-05 13:41:03 from Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2003-10-01 17:48:44 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-01 14:44:57 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-01 13:19:51 from "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
2003-10-01 17:47:57 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-01 19:11:02 from "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
2003-10-01 19:31:54 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-01 19:49:55 from Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
2003-10-01 20:02:47 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-01 23:11:27 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-02 17:47:06 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-02 19:15:33 from Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
2003-10-03 15:17:15 from Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
2003-10-03 16:17:16 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-03 16:39:55 from Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
2003-10-03 16:47:58 from "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2003-10-07 12:03:10 from Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
2003-10-07 15:34:24 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-07 15:52:42 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2003-10-07 15:58:26 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-07 17:59:12 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-07 18:21:49 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-07 18:01:42 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-08 01:28:40 from Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
2003-10-03 21:41:45 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-03 22:28:07 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-03 22:20:55 from "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
2003-10-01 19:35:15 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
2003-10-01 23:09:10 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-02 12:28:08 from Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
2003-10-03 21:37:52 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-04 03:36:57 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-04 03:42:00 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-04 15:41:17 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-05 03:13:34 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
2003-10-05 03:53:49 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-05 20:31:33 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
2003-10-05 21:41:59 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-09 19:36:12 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-05 03:17:09 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-05 03:26:56 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
2003-10-05 03:57:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-05 04:40:37 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-05 06:11:11 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-05 14:28:31 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-09 19:30:18 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-09 19:34:27 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-01 22:11:18 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-01 22:23:16 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-01 22:35:55 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-10-01 15:40:57 from Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
2003-10-01 15:49:51 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2003-10-01 16:30:31 from Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:47:06 -0700,
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Possible scenario for maintaining 7.3:
>
> Only one or two committers using a two stage cvs... one stage for
> testing (not including sandbox), one stage for commit.
> Scheduled releases based on non-critical fixes. Quarterly? Of course
> critical fixes should be released as soon as plausible.
>
> Separate mailing list for 7.3 issues, concerns etc... Which would help
> develop it's own temporary community.
>
> Thoughts?
It might be better to split into two different trees. One just gets bug fixes,
the other gets bug fixes plus enhancements that won't require an initdb.
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Dror MatalonDate: 2003-10-02 19:15:47
Subject : count(*) slow on large tables
Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2003-10-02 19:10:46
Subject : Re: Large block size problems and notes...