Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 2-phase commit

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Date: 2003-09-29 03:56:00
Message-ID: 20030929005440.Y632@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

> The simplest senario(though there could be varations) is
>
> [At participant(master)'s side]
>   Because the commit operations is done, does nothing.
>
> [At coordinator(slave)' side]
>    1) After a while
>    2) re-establish the communication path between the
>       partcipant(master)'s TM.
>    3) resend the "commit requeset" to the participant's TM.
>   1)2)3) would be repeated until the coordinator receives
>   the "commit ok" message from the partcipant.
>
> If there's no objection from you, I would assume I'm right.

'K, but what happens if the slave never gets a 'commit ok'?  Does the
slave keep trying ad nausem?

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-09-29 04:02:48
Subject: Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-09-29 03:48:48
Subject: Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group