| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing |
| Date: | 2003-09-27 05:09:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20030927130849.T15218-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ah, I was just thinking that you could do a nice multi-line version (same
as how they are dumped from 7.3.x)
But yes, it doesn't really matter.
Chris
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> > I note there is no pretty printing option for pg_get_triggerdef...
>
> Right.
> There's no expression tree displayed, which would make the pretty print
> option necessary.
>
> As long as we don't have reengineering functions for *all* objects, it
> doesn't make sense to implement pretty-print for line formatting on this
> single function.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-09-27 05:20:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-27 04:38:31 | Re: Use of $(THREAD_CFLAGS) in CPPFLAGS |