Re: bug in vacuumlo?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Irina Sourikova <irina(at)bnl(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bug in vacuumlo?
Date: 2003-09-24 02:34:56
Message-ID: 20030924103444.H72688-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Do we need a 'AND NOT a.attisdropped' in there anywhere as well?

Chris

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Irina Sourikova wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to use vacuumlo of posgres-7.3.4/contrib/vacuumlo and it didn't
> work
> for me until I added one line:
>
> strcat(buf, " AND c.relname <> 'vacuum_l'");
>
> after strcat(buf, "SELECT c.relname, a.attname ");
> strcat(buf, "FROM pg_class c, pg_attribute a, pg_type t ");
> strcat(buf, "WHERE a.attnum > 0 ");
> strcat(buf, " AND a.attrelid = c.oid ");
> strcat(buf, " AND a.atttypid = t.oid ");
> strcat(buf, " AND t.typname in ('oid', 'lo') ");
> strcat(buf, " AND c.relkind = 'r'");
>
> Is it a bug or I'm missing something?
>
> Thank you,
> Irina
> irina(at)bnl(dot)gov
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-24 05:39:18 Re: bug in vacuumlo?
Previous Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-09-24 00:19:39 tsearch2 memory alloc checks