Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bug in vacuumlo?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Irina Sourikova <irina(at)bnl(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bug in vacuumlo?
Date: 2003-09-24 02:34:56
Message-ID: 20030924103444.H72688-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Do we need a 'AND NOT a.attisdropped' in there anywhere as well?

Chris

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Irina Sourikova wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to use vacuumlo of posgres-7.3.4/contrib/vacuumlo  and it didn't
> work
> for me until I added one line:
>
>     strcat(buf, "      AND c.relname <> 'vacuum_l'");
>
> after     strcat(buf, "SELECT c.relname, a.attname ");
>    strcat(buf, "FROM pg_class c, pg_attribute a, pg_type t ");
>    strcat(buf, "WHERE a.attnum > 0 ");
>    strcat(buf, "      AND a.attrelid = c.oid ");
>    strcat(buf, "      AND a.atttypid = t.oid ");
>    strcat(buf, "      AND t.typname in ('oid', 'lo') ");
>    strcat(buf, "      AND c.relkind = 'r'");
>
> Is it a bug or I'm missing something?
>
> Thank you,
> Irina
> irina(at)bnl(dot)gov
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-09-24 05:39:18
Subject: Re: bug in vacuumlo?
Previous:From: Nigel J. AndrewsDate: 2003-09-24 00:19:39
Subject: tsearch2 memory alloc checks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group