Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Date: 2003-09-24 00:24:46
Message-ID: 20030923212401.U27456@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


Altho printed would be good for shows and what not ... if someone would
even come up with *strong* PDF versions that anyone could download and
distribution? Or use as part of proposals to clients / bosses? That
would be great also ...

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I would be willing to donate $$$ to the printing of brochures.
> Specifically brochures that would point out:
>
> 1. MySQL's NON ACID compliance
> 2. PostgreSQL ACID compliance
> 3. MySQL license issues
> 4. PostgreSQL NON License issues
> 5. PostgreSQL long development history
> 6. Examples of successful PostgreSQL users
>
> etc...
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua Drake
>
>
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> >> Alexey, Ian,
> >>
> >>> There are 2 sorts of people using MySQL:
> >>> 1) Those who know several RDBMSs and use it only when it is the best
> >>> tool for the job (read-only web DB, storing logs, etc)
> >>> 2) Those who know only MySQL and think that it is the Ultimate Solution
> >>> for Everything.
> >>
> >>
> >> Actually, for Comdex, I'm concerned about:
> >>
> >> 3) Management who know nothing about technology and are considering
> >> MySQL because MySQL AB has very nice brochures.
> >>
> >> This is *very* important becuase no-nothing management types are
> >> frequently in a position to mandate technology choice. MySQL, like
> >> Microsoft before them, have realized that being *perceived* as an
> >> enterprise database is, from a sales perspective, almost as good as
> >> being one.
> >> We will be at the convention with some card tables, some CDs and a
> >> handful of xeroxed brochures. MySQL will have a multi-media booth
> >> with big banners and uniforms. We need some substance to counter the
> >> glitz, and this is a very good start.
> >>
> >> That being said, I would like to see Alexey's other points included
> >> in the paper. *particularly* the part about license changes and
> >> MySQL's closed development process.
> >>
> >
> > Where
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2003-09/msg01400.php
> >
> > fit's perfectly.
> >
> >
> > Jan
> >
> >
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
> Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
> +1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
> The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-09-24 00:44:06 Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2003-09-23 21:49:06 Re: About GPL and proprietary software