Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-13 17:01:05
Message-ID: 200309131701.h8DH16A15954@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


Done.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I can make the change, but --without seemed to more closely match
> > because it was like readline where you didn't have it, and had to say so
> > specifically. I don't see how we can say --disable because this is case
> > were we clearly don't have spinlocks to enable, no?
>
> ./configure --help | grep --relevant-stuff
>
> Optional Features:
> --disable-FEATURE do not include FEATURE (same as --enable-FEATURE=no)
> --enable-FEATURE[=ARG] include FEATURE [ARG=yes]
>
> Optional Packages:
> --with-PACKAGE[=ARG] use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
> --without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)
>
> Readline is a package, spinlocks are a feature.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-13 20:47:44 Link.shared help
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-13 16:27:14 Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-09-13 22:06:50 more doc improvements
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-13 16:44:56 Re: Regression test for stats collector