From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Date: | 2003-09-12 18:14:38 |
Message-ID: | 200309121814.h8CIEcS25660@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > o adds a configure option --without-spinlocks to allow
> > non-spinlock compiles
>
> --disable-spinlocks please.
I can make the change, but --without seemed to more closely match
because it was like readline where you didn't have it, and had to say so
specifically. I don't see how we can say --disable because this is case
were we clearly don't have spinlocks to enable, no?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-09-12 19:18:02 | Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-12 18:10:55 | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-09-12 18:16:07 | Re: tsearch pfree error |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-12 18:10:55 | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |