Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-12 18:14:38
Message-ID: 200309121814.h8CIEcS25660@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > o adds a configure option --without-spinlocks to allow
> > non-spinlock compiles
>
> --disable-spinlocks please.

I can make the change, but --without seemed to more closely match
because it was like readline where you didn't have it, and had to say so
specifically. I don't see how we can say --disable because this is case
were we clearly don't have spinlocks to enable, no?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2003-09-12 19:18:02 Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-12 18:10:55 Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-09-12 18:16:07 Re: tsearch pfree error
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-12 18:10:55 Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines