Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: best arrangement of 3 disks for (insert) performance

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: rj(at)last(dot)fm, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: best arrangement of 3 disks for (insert) performance
Date: 2003-09-12 16:49:52
Message-ID: 200309120949.52871.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-performance
RIchard,

> its a dual xeon 2.4,  4gb ram and 3x identical 15k rpm scsi disks
> 
> should i mirror 2 of the disks for postgres data, and use the 3rd disk for 
the 
> o/s and the pg logs or raid5 the 3 disks or even stripe 2 disks for pg and 
> use the 3rd for o/s,logs,backups ?

I'd mirror 2.   Stripey RAID with few disks imposes a heavy performance 
penalty on data writes (particularly updates), sometimes as much as 50% for a 
RAID5-3disk config.  

I am a little curious why you've got a dual-xeon, but could only afford 3 
disks ....

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-09-12 16:55:06
Subject: Re: software vs hw hard on linux
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2003-09-12 15:32:18
Subject: Re: software vs hw hard on linux

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Richard JonesDate: 2003-09-12 16:55:40
Subject: Re: best arrangement of 3 disks for (insert) performance
Previous:From: Martin MarquesDate: 2003-09-12 16:45:20
Subject: Re: Why do I need to pass value for Serial type in Insert/Update?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group