Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-12 04:09:50
Message-ID: 200309120409.h8C49oV06119@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Well, the problem was that we defined HAS_TEST_AND_SET inside the ports.
> > I guess we could splatter a test for Itanium and Opterion in every port
> > that could possibly use it, but then again, if we fall back to not
> > finding it for some reason, we don't get a report because we silently
> > fall back to semaphores. That's what has me worried, that if we don't
> > do it, we will not know what platforms really aren't working properly.
>
> >From what I understand, "not working properly" means slow, not broken, no?
> Which means ppl could submit a problem report and it could be fixed for
> v7.4.1 ... its not so much 'not working properly' as it is 'not optimal
> performance' ...

Right, though I am not sure people will know _slow_ configuration vs.
PostgreSQL is slow.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-12 04:10:57 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-12 04:09:23 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-12 04:10:57 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-12 04:09:23 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines