From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Date: | 2003-09-12 04:09:50 |
Message-ID: | 200309120409.h8C49oV06119@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Well, the problem was that we defined HAS_TEST_AND_SET inside the ports.
> > I guess we could splatter a test for Itanium and Opterion in every port
> > that could possibly use it, but then again, if we fall back to not
> > finding it for some reason, we don't get a report because we silently
> > fall back to semaphores. That's what has me worried, that if we don't
> > do it, we will not know what platforms really aren't working properly.
>
> >From what I understand, "not working properly" means slow, not broken, no?
> Which means ppl could submit a problem report and it could be fixed for
> v7.4.1 ... its not so much 'not working properly' as it is 'not optimal
> performance' ...
Right, though I am not sure people will know _slow_ configuration vs.
PostgreSQL is slow.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-12 04:10:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-09-12 04:09:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-12 04:10:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-09-12 04:09:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |