Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, hcarle(at)afilias(dot)info,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
Date: 2003-08-13 03:19:18
Message-ID: 20030813001637.J53095@hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Joe Conway wrote:

> >>>>INSERT CITY/STATE - August xx, 2003 -
> >>>
> >>>Can you give me a suggestion about this for the 7.4 release?  PostgreSQL isn't
> >>>located anywhere in particular.   But if we omit the city and state, some
> >>>news agencies will fill in TORONTO, CANADA on their own, furthering the
> >>>confusion between us and PostgreSQL Inc.
>
> Given that this is a global project, we should be able to use *any*
> city, right? So why not Redwood Shores, CA? ;-)

IMHO, the release should be "anchored" where the project is anchored ...
that was why, in the past, it was Toronto, Canada (it had nothing to do
with PgSQL, Inc, since PgSQL, Inc was never located in Toronto) ...


In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-08-13 04:26:07
Subject: Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-08-13 03:10:06
Subject: Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group