Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Answer = sane == 'fill buffer, don't overfill buffer' ? 'yes' : 'no';
> Seriously, I will add comments when I submit the revised patch to
> demonstrate the loop invariants etc. so nobody need get worried when
> reading the code.
> As for session end logging, I'm leaning in favor of a new
> log_session_end or log_connection_end boolean, so that there is minimal
> backwards compatibility impact. (Interestingly, that is actually the
> only part of this stuff that is of any use to me right now).
Agreed. A separate boolean is more self-documenting than 0/1/2.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2003-08-11 21:11:09|
|Subject: Re: logging enhancements, minor code cleanup|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2003-08-11 15:27:07|
|Subject: Re: NLS: czech update|