Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option
Date: 2003-07-31 14:59:17
Message-ID: 200307311459.h6VExHr20262@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I didn't like the functions ending in _ext. I renamed them to _pp for
> > pretty print. Patch attached and applied.
>
> Seems to be shy a catversion bump; since you have just made an
> incompatible change in the internal-function-names array, one is needed.
>
> But I disagree with your opinion anyway --- _ext for "extended" made
> perfect sense to me, especially for the get_indexdef one which adds more
> than just prettyprint functionality.

OK. I never did the commit, so I will just discard the patch.

Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2003-07-31 16:01:21 Re: [Fwd: Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-31 14:45:52 Re: [Fwd: Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option]