Re: What I would say if someone asked me about no win32

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: What I would say if someone asked me about no win32
Date: 2003-07-30 15:34:16
Message-ID: 200307300834.16643.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

People,

> Q. Hey, I read in a bunch of places that 7.4 was going to have native
> windows support, what gives?

My answer:

A. PostgreSQL has a well-deserved reputation for "bulletproof" reliability and
stability, which requires each new patch and plug-in to pass stringent
community testing. The Win32 platform has proved to be more of a challenge
than we anticipated in this regard, and we would rather release our Windows
port late than release a version which might fail in production environments.

But, Bruce, since you're head of the port, wanna comment on this? We're
trying to prepare a "canned" answer for the inevitable questions.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-30 15:36:05 Re: erServer Release WAS: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-30 15:31:55 Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: Why READ ONLY transactions?