Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
Date: 2003-07-29 23:52:59
Message-ID: 200307291652.59764.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Heather,

> Contact:
> INSERT POSTGRESQL CONTACT NAME/COMPANY/PHONE/EMAIL
>
> INSERT CITY/STATE - August xx, 2003 -

I was getting to that, really ....

> My personal opinion is that their is still too much deep technical detail
> in the body ... but you don't need to waste time reworking the entire
> release. I would cut down on the headers though ... for instance I don't
> think Ram's quote needs and intro ... really quotes should be used to
> transition between ideas, or make third party substantiation claims against
> a key part of your product messaging.

Yeah. Rod's pseudo-quote does this nicely. Unfortunately, I have a hard
time finding a place for any part of Ram's quote. Suggestions?

> Also if you can, you should centralize on one URL ---
> all those URLs in the release are confusing. If you want people to find the
> other stuff I'd have a hotlink on the site you send them to that says
> "Postgres v7.4 info" (or someething like that) and then detail the history,
> download, release, etc.

Sure, if we have time to compose such a page. Hmmm ... I suppose this can
just be the "technical version" of the release.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-07-30 00:26:30 Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-29 23:46:53 Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written