Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3
Date: 2003-07-22 23:18:24
Message-ID: 200307221618.24849.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Andrew,

> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:13:34AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > "If you tried PostgreSQL before, and it wasn't quite fast enough,
> > and you went with Oracle, it's time to re-evaluate," suggests Rod
>
> Can I suggest you use "something else" instead of "Oracle"? I know
> it's weasely, but Oracle has lawyers and they're not afraid to use
> them.

How could Oracle sue us for claiming to be as good or faster? MySQL does
this all the time, and I don't see that it's landed them in any legal hot
water.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2003-07-23 00:28:33 Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-07-22 20:07:14 Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3