| From: | Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | AgentM <agentm(at)cmu(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux |
| Date: | 2003-06-27 02:31:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200306271231.24667.philip@utiba.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:16 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> BSD/OS supports:
>
> The pthreads library conforms to IEEE Std1003.1c
> (``POSIX'').
>
> How is that different from UNIX98?
Just checked up on this: apparently version "g" of the standard does contain
such manipulation functions... and Tru64's man page for
pthread_mutexattr_settype claims:
Interfaces documented on this reference page conform to industry standards
as follows:
IEEE Std 1003.1c-1995, POSIX System Application Program Interface
Of course, they might be lying.
Anyway, hopefully I can just avoid these recursive locks, and avoid finding
out who supports what.
Regards, Philip.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-27 02:55:45 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-27 02:17:00 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-27 03:57:54 | Re: Weird behaviour on Solaris: recv() returns ENOENT |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-27 02:16:37 | Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux |