Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting

From: nolan(at)celery(dot)tssi(dot)com
To: techlist(at)voyager(dot)phys(dot)utk(dot)edu
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org (pgsql general list)
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
Date: 2003-06-24 16:57:47
Message-ID: 20030624165747.6742.qmail@celery.tssi.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-docspgsql-general
> Agreed. I am starting a list of what can/need to be indexed on pgsql docs 
> site  as I'm working to build a new site with pgsql as a backend. I 
> think Tom Lane > suggested that.. I would like to know where I can send 
> the list. It'll probably somekind of a work in progress. So if everyone 
> else can contribute, > it'll be so much faster. Probably a semi-automated 
> system for handling those
> lists?

Assuming some kind of full-text search facility, an interesting idea would
be a self-updating index, one that keeps track of what search terms
are commonly used and adds those to the index automatically.
--
Mike Nolan

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-06-24 17:03:02
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
Previous:From: Reuben D. BudiardjaDate: 2003-06-24 16:40:46
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-06-24 17:03:02
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
Previous:From: Reuben D. BudiardjaDate: 2003-06-24 16:40:46
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Kurt RoeckxDate: 2003-06-24 17:02:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ss_family in hba.c
Previous:From: PeterKormanDate: 2003-06-24 16:56:54
Subject: Re: Looking for PERL documentation (fwd)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group