| From: | nolan(at)celery(dot)tssi(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | techlist(at)voyager(dot)phys(dot)utk(dot)edu |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org (pgsql general list) |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting |
| Date: | 2003-06-24 16:57:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20030624165747.6742.qmail@celery.tssi.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
> Agreed. I am starting a list of what can/need to be indexed on pgsql docs
> site as I'm working to build a new site with pgsql as a backend. I
> think Tom Lane > suggested that.. I would like to know where I can send
> the list. It'll probably somekind of a work in progress. So if everyone
> else can contribute, > it'll be so much faster. Probably a semi-automated
> system for handling those
> lists?
Assuming some kind of full-text search facility, an interesting idea would
be a self-updating index, one that keeps track of what search terms
are commonly used and adds those to the index automatically.
--
Mike Nolan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-06-24 17:03:02 | Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting |
| Previous Message | Reuben D. Budiardja | 2003-06-24 16:40:46 | Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-06-24 17:03:02 | Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting |
| Previous Message | Reuben D. Budiardja | 2003-06-24 16:40:46 | Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kurt Roeckx | 2003-06-24 17:02:14 | Re: [HACKERS] ss_family in hba.c |
| Previous Message | PeterKorman | 2003-06-24 16:56:54 | Re: Looking for PERL documentation (fwd) |