Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting

From: "Reuben D(dot) Budiardja" <techlist(at)voyager(dot)phys(dot)utk(dot)edu>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "'Advocacy PostgreSQL'" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"'PostgreSQL-general'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
Date: 2003-06-24 16:40:46
Message-ID: 200306241240.46216.techlist@voyager.phys.utk.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-docspgsql-general
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 11:47 am, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Can I propose that we move this thread to PGSQL-DOCS?   And that you all
> join PGSQL-DOCS?    I really would like to see more people formally
> involved in writing documentation for PostgreSQL, and will work hard to
> make it easier for people to contribute.

Agreed. I am starting a list of what can/need to be indexed on pgsql docs site 
as I'm working to build a new site with pgsql as a backend. I think Tom Lane 
suggested that.. I would like to know where I can send the list. It'll 
probably somekind of a work in progress. So if everyone else can contribute, 
it'll be so much faster. Probably a semi-automated system for handling those 
lists?

RDB

-- 
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
-------------------------------------------------
/"\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML    
\ /  email and proprietary format      
 X   attachments.
/ \
-------------------------------------------------
Have you been used by Microsoft today? 
Choose your life. Choose freedom. 
Choose LINUX.
-------------------------------------------------


In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: nolanDate: 2003-06-24 16:57:47
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
Previous:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2003-06-24 15:47:41
Subject: [OT] Windows v/s Unix [was Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting]

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: nolanDate: 2003-06-24 16:57:47
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-06-24 16:25:58
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: enabling postgresql by default

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tony GrantDate: 2003-06-24 16:52:43
Subject: Re: A creepy story about dates. How to prevent it?
Previous:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2003-06-24 16:38:51
Subject: Re: Selecting dupes from table

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group