Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: "Advocacy (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread
Date: 2003-06-23 17:19:04
Message-ID: 20030623171904.GY97131@perrin.int.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs pgsql-general

[ killing cross posting between general@ and advocacy@ ]

> For this reason and many others, it is considered a bad design
> decision to have included the connect libs in the PHP's source tree.
> It basically made it easier for junior sys admins to shoot
> themselves in the foot. :-)

Or for Jr. Admins at www virtual hosting ISPs to setup PHP pizza boxes
without having to install PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL needs a
--client-only option to ./configure to be competitive in terms of cost
of installation in that dept. -sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-23 17:21:42 Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread
Previous Message Justin Clift 2003-06-23 17:02:51 Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-23 17:23:37 Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread
Previous Message Justin Clift 2003-06-23 17:02:51 Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-23 17:21:42 Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread
Previous Message Dan Langille 2003-06-23 17:03:37 Powebuilder 9 and PostgreSQL