Re: sql question (hopefully)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: <mel(at)gmanmi(dot)tv>, "'Ron Johnson'" <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, "'PgSQL Novice ML'" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Dani Oderbolz'" <oderbolz(at)ecologic(dot)de>
Subject: Re: sql question (hopefully)
Date: 2003-06-18 15:13:30
Message-ID: 200306180813.30095.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Mel,

> i wanted to find out for sure if i really won't get the desired result(s)
> in sql and have to create a function instead.

Perhaps, but the function better be in C, or your performance will continue to
suck ...

> yes it breaks the 1st normal form. we did this for some *practical*
> purposes supposedly. =) i would've wanted to discuss it here but i'll
> probably bore you to death or i'd end up starting a new discussion
> altogether. since it's in production and i need to do a quick patch
> without touching the external programs depending on this schema, i've to
> find a quick remedy.

To be frank, boyo, you're on the road to hell.

I am constantly amazed at how many newbie DBAs adopt not-normalized schema
because "it's faster" and then have to add in workarounds that kill the
performance of their database.

Anyway, if someone else doesn't solve it, I'll come up with a SQL solution
later in the week ....

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fontenot, Paul 2003-06-18 16:16:50 Vacuum and inserts
Previous Message Mel Jamero 2003-06-18 14:40:49 Re: sql question (hopefully)