Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Which database part 2

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Which database part 2
Date: 2003-06-14 12:35:15
Message-ID: 20030614123515.GB27374@wolff.to (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:42:35 +0800,
  Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> >Kaarel,
> >
> >
> >>Why did SourceForge.net move from PostgreSQL to DB2?
> >
> >
> >Perhaps because VA Software made a multi-million dollar deal with IBM?
> ><grin>
> 
> So this has been transitioned already?  The SF.net site has been 
> extremely flaky recently (have been trying to do things on it 
> extensively in the last few weeks).  Wonder if it's transition or DB2 
> related?

The change happened quite a while ago. I don't remember exactly, but I
think it was over a year ago.

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Nick FankhauserDate: 2003-06-14 14:40:30
Subject: A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous:From: Jean-Michel POUREDate: 2003-06-14 10:20:27
Subject: Re: BakBone PostgreSQL Backup Utility

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group