Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning
Date: 2003-06-10 17:21:42
Message-ID: 20030610172142.GA17801@wolff.to (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 21:26:49 +0530,
  Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
> 
> Point is we should be able to say RTFC rather than RTFA as that would get a DBA 
> single place to look at.  I agree that no amount of simplicity is enough but 
> still..:-)

I believe there was discussion a couple of months ago that came to a
different conclusion. There was concern about having documenation that
wasn't in the documentation and have to versions of essentially the
same information that both need to be maintained.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 18:01:46
Subject: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 16:03:50
Subject: Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group