Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Date: 2003-06-10 21:45:13
Message-ID: 200306101445.13513.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Folks,

Revised ordering of options, based on information and suggestions received 
here on both mailing lists.

-- 
-Josh Berkus

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
                                        Josh Berkus
   Complete information technology 	josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
    and data management solutions 	(415) 565-7293
   for law firms, small businesses 	 fax 621-2533
    and non-profit organizations. 	San Francisco

Attachment: re_order_conf
Description: text/plain (2.6 KB)

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Vincent van LeeuwenDate: 2003-06-10 23:10:36
Subject: Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 21:29:42
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 21:52:08
Subject: Subtitles in postgresql docs SGML?
Previous:From: Forest WilkinsonDate: 2003-06-10 21:45:07
Subject: How to enumerate foreign key constraints after migrating from 7.1.3?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Ewald GeschwindeDate: 2003-06-10 21:55:17
Subject: Re: Which database?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-10 21:35:04
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group