Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Richard Huxton <richardh(at)archonet(dot)com>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Date: 2003-06-10 21:29:42
Message-ID: 200306101429.43003.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Tom,

> I doubt anyone would object to improving the comments during beta; so
> you don't need to consider that part something that has to be done
> before feature freeze.

Oh, cool.  OK, then ... the hard part is just deciding on what comments to 
include.   We'll work on that in this list.

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-06-10 21:45:13
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-10 21:28:43
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-10 21:35:04
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-10 21:28:43
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-10 21:35:04
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-10 21:28:43
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group