Re: are views typically any faster/slower than equivilent joins?

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Brian Tarbox <btarbox(at)theworld(dot)com>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: are views typically any faster/slower than equivilent joins?
Date: 2003-06-01 05:43:37
Message-ID: 20030601054337.GD16259@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 00:02:39 -0400,
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> wrote:
>
> Some views such as unions will not be as fast as you would like, but
> thats a general issue with PostgreSQLs inability to throw away selects
> when it won't find results on one side of a union.
>
> CREATE VIEW sales AS SELECT * FROM sales_archive_2002 UNION ALL SELECT *
> FROM sales_current;
>
>
> SELECT * FROM sales WHERE timestamp => CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1
> day';
>
> The above query would not be so quick.

I thought some work had been done on pushing where conditions down into
unions? If so the above wouldn't be too bad. It would still look at
the archive table, but it should return no rows relatively quickly
assuming an appropiate index exists.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave E Martin XXIII 2003-06-01 07:20:03 Re: Index speeds up one row table (why)?
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-06-01 05:33:39 Re: Index speeds up one row table (why)?