Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DDL triggers?

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>,SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DDL triggers?
Date: 2003-05-20 17:52:03
Message-ID: 20030520105039.M69760-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: sfpug
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> David,
>
> > > Alternately, we can raise this on -Hackers and see what the
> > > difficulty would be for hacking some of the libraries to either:
> > >
> > > 1) save all DDL statements to a log, or:
> >
> > This would actually be a super-groovy thing in general, 'cause the
> > stuff pg_dump spits out, while useful from a reloading point of view,
> > is a royal PITA from a reverse-engineering point of view.  Ideally,
> > DDL's would get logged in the precise state (ideally, with "--"'s
> > included) that they were in before they got executed.
>
> I think this would be relatively easy; in fact, I'm sure that Joe Conway could
> do it.   Why don't you give him a buzz?

It should be easy presumably.  You might be able to cheat right now if you
turn on statement logging and wrote a script to get them out of the logs.



In response to

sfpug by date

Next:From: eleinDate: 2003-05-20 18:36:11
Subject: Re: DDL triggers?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-05-20 17:09:40
Subject: Re: DDL triggers?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group