Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: "pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Date: 2003-05-03 08:15:40
Message-ID: 200305031345.40156.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Saturday 03 May 2003 13:27, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Friday 02 May 2003 16:10, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > More disks is almost always better.  Putting WAL on a seperate (non-RAID)
> > disk is usually a very good idea.
>
> From a performance POV perhaps.  The subject came up on hackers recently
> and it was pointed out that if you use RAID for reliability and redundancy
> rather than for performance, you need to keep the WAL files on the RAID
> too.

but for performance reason, that RAID can be separate from the data RAID..:-)

 Shridhar

-- 
"Gee, Toto, I don't think we are in Kansas anymore."


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-05-03 10:04:22
Subject: Re: looking for large dataset
Previous:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2003-05-03 08:02:49
Subject: Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group