Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 defines

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 defines
Date: 2003-04-18 01:04:18
Message-ID: 200304180104.h3I14IT19518@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
OK, patch attached and applied.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > OK, I have modified the patch to match your suggestions. I also removed
> > the N_PLAT_NLM define because I think that just got in when we were
> > thinking about the Novell port that we cancelled.  Is that correct?
> 
> Could you use HAVE_WORKING_LINK instead of HAVE_LINK?  The symbol names
> containing _WORKING_ are sort of standard for cases where the function
> exists but doesn't really work well.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
> 
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-04-18 03:17:20
Subject: Win32 patch for COPY
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-04-18 00:21:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group