Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Date: 2003-04-15 20:36:52
Message-ID: 200304152036.h3FKaqx06256@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Tom Lane wrote:
> Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> > This all sounds great.  I am really looking to seeing all of this 
> > implemented.  Are you still on schedule for getting this into 7.4?
> 
> I gotta get off my duff and get with it, but I still plan to do it.

I am wondering if the wondering if the start of 7.5 may not be a better
time for such a massive change, and to give interfaces time to catch up.

Also, is Patrick going to need your help for PITR in 7.4?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-15 20:42:42
Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Previous:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2003-04-15 20:31:18
Subject: Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-15 20:42:42
Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-15 14:17:27
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group