| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Date: | 2003-04-15 20:59:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20030415175823.G8872@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> Geez Neil, if I didn't know better I'd say you were trying to troll with
> your docbook suggestion. Before Josh goes off on another rant or justin
> gets his nickers in a pinch or someone else recommends doing everything
> in .doc format can we all just take a break for a bit?
>
> We have a plan, step #1 is determining the status of our server.
>
> Marc, can we get an update on that? Are there still plans to move
> techdocs or has that been taken care of?
Other then moving techdocs to the postgresql.org VM, there are no plans to
actually move it ... whether it stays in its current incarnation, or moves
to bricolage, or moves to ... depends on who feels they are up to stepping
into Justin's shoes on that site ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-04-15 21:17:47 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-04-15 20:45:29 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |