Re: Tech Docs and Consultants

From: elein <elein(at)sbcglobal(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Date: 2003-04-14 19:39:04
Message-ID: 200304141943.h3EJhRYH081296@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


OK, In summary:

Justin needs a break.
Josh is willing to take over techdocs.
Elein, Richard, John are willing to help.

We have decided to keep techdocs at hub.org
with the other postgresql sites.

We will keep the current zwiki part of techdocs
and possibly enhance it.

We need to improve contribution turn around for
input into the techdoc page, ideally enabling
anyone to contribute articles, reviews, etc.

The decision on the infrastruction is up in the air.
The choices are:
a) static html/css
b) bricolage
c) php/css
d) wiki (enhanced or regular)
e) as yet unknown

Josh, if you are running the show, then you get to decide
on the infrastructure. But you'll need to look at the options
to find what you're most comfortable with. And everyone else gets
an opinion/input. I'm sure Marc will accomodate what we need
when we decide.

I'm familiar wikis, php/css and static html. I don't know
anything about bricolage (yet?). But I know how to create an
open wiki which is also human engineered to be structured and
how to keep it that way.

Lets get going.

elein

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
elein(at)varlena(dot)com Database Consulting www.varlena.com
I have always depended on the [QA] of strangers.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-04-14 22:21:43 Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-04-14 19:34:15 Re: Tech Docs and Consultants