From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |
Date: | 2003-03-20 16:58:25 |
Message-ID: | 200303201658.h2KGwPN11971@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
> >> Do you think we should replace them all with a utility called pg_maintain
> >> that can do all of them?
>
> > If you ask me, we could get rid of them completely because
> > for d in $(psql -l --somthing); do vacuum $d; done
> > seems perfectly fine.
>
> If you have a real shell (and know how to use it), sure. Is such a
> solution acceptable to all those Windows users we're hoping to attract?
That's why I am thinking of some wrapper that will loop through the
databases and run psql commands.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-03-20 17:22:28 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-20 16:55:09 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-03-20 17:22:28 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-20 16:55:09 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |