> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > I haven't had time to look into it further, but it occurs to me that
> > handling views which rely on joins would be far from trivial.
> 
> Views containing joins would not be updatable; problem solved. 

I see how that is what the spec says, but aren't the majority of joins that
people use/want to update a join of some type?  I thought that SQL99 allowed
updating view created by joins.

In either case is this a place where "exceeding" the spec would be a good 
thing or a bad thing?

Eric

Responses

• Re: Updateable views... at 2003-03-05 15:47:44 from Tom Lane
• Re: Updateable views... at 2003-03-05 16:12:01 from Rod Taylor
• Re: Updateable views... at 2003-03-05 16:29:45 from Curt Sampson

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2003-03-05 15:47:44
	Subject: Re: Updateable views...
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2003-03-05 15:36:06
	Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Non-colliding auto generated names