> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > I haven't had time to look into it further, but it occurs to me that
> > handling views which rely on joins would be far from trivial.
> Views containing joins would not be updatable; problem solved.
I see how that is what the spec says, but aren't the majority of joins that
people use/want to update a join of some type? I thought that SQL99 allowed
updating view created by joins.
In either case is this a place where "exceeding" the spec would be a good
thing or a bad thing?
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-03-05 15:47:44|
|Subject: Re: Updateable views... |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2003-03-05 15:36:06|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Non-colliding auto generated names|