| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Offering tuned config files |
| Date: | 2003-02-15 14:15:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20030215221429.J63048-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
No, not really - I can do some more testing with pgbench to see what
happens though...I'll do it on monday
Chris
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> writes:
> > In postgresql.conf.sample-writeheavy you have:
> > commit_delay = 10000
> > Is this still needed with "ganged WAL writes"? Tom?
>
> I doubt that the current options for grouped commits are worth anything
> at the moment. Chris, do you have any evidence backing up using
> commit_delay with 7.3?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-15 14:27:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-02-15 08:36:39 | Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-15 14:23:38 | Re: stats_command_string default? |
| Previous Message | daniel alvarez | 2003-02-15 13:14:42 | Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!! |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Cain | 2003-02-15 20:36:31 | Re: [Gmod-schema] Re: performace problem after VACUUM |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-02-15 08:36:39 | Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers |