From: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) |
Date: | 2003-02-14 05:31:24 |
Message-ID: | 20030214053124.GQ1833@filer |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
> If I thought that pgbench was representative of anything, or even
> capable of reliably producing repeatable numbers, then I might subscribe
> to results derived this way. But I have little or no confidence in
> pgbench. Certainly I don't see how you'd use it to produce
> recommendations for a range of application scenarios, when it's only
> one very narrow scenario itself.
So let's say you were designing a tool to help someone get reasonable
performance out of a PostgreSQL installation. What scenarios would
you include in such a tool, and what information would you want out of
it?
You don't have any real confidence in pgbench. Fair enough. What
*would* you have confidence in?
--
Kevin Brown kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-14 06:04:34 | Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) |
Previous Message | Kevin Brown | 2003-02-14 05:06:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Brown | 2003-02-14 05:59:42 | Re: location of the configuration files |
Previous Message | Kevin Brown | 2003-02-14 05:06:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-14 06:04:34 | Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) |
Previous Message | Kevin Brown | 2003-02-14 05:06:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: |