Re: location of the configuration files

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, "J(dot) M(dot) Brenner" <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: location of the configuration files
Date: 2003-02-14 03:11:05
Message-ID: 200302140311.h1E3B5V14767@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen wrote:
> > I am now wondering if we even want pg_hba_dir and pg_ident_dir. Seems
> > we can assume they are in the same directory as postgresql.conf. That
> > leaves only data_dir as new for postgresql.conf.
>
> Ok, if we're going this far already, tell me exactly why we have three config
> files. Why not really Unify things and fulfil the full promise of Grand
> Unified Configuration by rolling hba and ident into postgresql.conf. Is
> there a compelling reason not to do so? The structure of that configuration
> data would have to change, for sure. Although I seem to remember this being
> suggested once before, but my mind draws a blank trying to recall it. Just a
> suggestion; maybe not even a good one, but something that crossed my mind.

postgresql.conf is var=val, while the others are column-based.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-02-14 03:16:04 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-14 03:10:35 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers