> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Assuming all your assumptions are right, why the hell is Oracle's and MS
> > SQL-Server's reputation that bloody good?
> They have marketing departments.
... As well as sizable systems integration departments devoted to the
platforms in question. PostgreSQL doesn't have the latter, although the
recent efforts make a move towards it.
> > And what about MySQL?
> What about it? Someone claimed in this thread that MySQL's Windows port
> requires Cygwin. Is that true or not?
The Windows binaries use the Cygwin library. Source code for the version of
Cygwin we have used is available on this page."
(reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.gultn@" "enworbbc"))
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however
improbable, must be the truth." -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930),
English author. Sherlock Holmes, in The Sign of Four, ch. 6 (1889).
[...but see the Holmesian Fallacy, due to Bob Frankston...
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: cbbrowne||Date: 2003-01-31 13:14:27|
|Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
|Previous:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2003-01-31 12:44:32|
|Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System|