Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?

From: Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Bruno Baguette" <bruno(dot)baguette(at)netcourrier(dot)com>,<pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?
Date: 2003-01-18 16:05:08
Message-ID: 200301181705.08479.barwick@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Saturday 18 January 2003 14:50, Bruno Baguette wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does somebody knows why this eWeek article that does a benchmark of
> theses Databases (DB2 7.2 ,SQL Server, MySQL,Oracle9i and ASE) whithout
> having added PostgreSQL ?
>
> Here's the URL of the article :
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp

No idea, but this seems to be the same article MySQL features
prominently at the top of their homepage.

Ian Barwick
barwick(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2003-01-19 00:29:18
Subject: PostgreSQL background image?
Previous:From: Bruno BaguetteDate: 2003-01-18 13:50:17
Subject: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group