| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |
| Date: | 2003-01-12 16:28:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200301121628.h0CGS9T17109@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Honestly I'm not so enthusiastic about scrollable cursors.
> > Even though PostgreSQL provides an efficient scrollable
> > cursor, I would use it little unless it could survive
> > across transactions.
> >
> > Anyway it's too bad that FETCH LAST means FETCH ALL.
>
> I would remove LAST, RELATIVE and SCROLL keywords
> for cursor related operations if there's no objection.
Are you suggesting removing FETCH LAST _and_ MOVE LAST?. I think MOVE
LAST works well.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-12 16:55:13 | Re: A modest proposal for a FAQ addition |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-12 16:20:38 | Re: default to WITHOUT OIDS? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Emmanuel Charpentier | 2003-01-12 18:45:33 | problem with update rules on a view (ODBC) |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2003-01-12 16:12:19 | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |