On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > I never considered tag'ng for minor releases as having any importance,
> > since the tarball's themselves provide the 'tag' ... branches give us the
> > ability to back-patch, but tag's don't provide us anything ... do they?
> Well, a tag makes it feasible for someone else to recreate the tarball,
> given access to the CVS server. Dunno how important that is in the real
> world --- but I have seen requests before for us to tag release points.
FWIW, in the real world, a release doesn't happen if it's not taqged.
In response to
pgsql-announce by date
|Next:||From: Greg Copeland||Date: 2003-01-05 14:53:25|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ...|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-01-05 01:10:19|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ... |
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Justin Clift||Date: 2003-01-05 13:21:51|
|Subject: Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...|
|Previous:||From: Peter Mount||Date: 2003-01-05 12:27:47|
|Subject: Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... |
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Markus Bengts||Date: 2003-01-05 13:34:25|
|Previous:||From: Timur Irmatov||Date: 2003-01-05 11:20:09|
|Subject: foreign key locks|